A division bench of the High Court today stayed the selection of an Anganwari worker of Manazrakh Pulwama who according to the appellants counsel had lesser merit than the Subaya Jan.According to Bashir Ahmad Bashir, senior lawyer and the counsel for Subaya Jan, CDPO Pulwama had notified the posts of Anganwari workers in Pulwma and one of the posts was meant for Manazrakh punch constituency 36.Three candidates applied for the post including Tahira Nazir, Suraya and Subaya Jan. Though Subaya had the highest merit and Suraya was next to her yet the officials for no reson selcted the lowest merit holder Tahira Nazir.Against this selection both the candidates Suraya and Subaya filed separate petitions before the High Court but during the pendency of the matter, the official respondents cancelled the selection of Tahira Nazir but mischievously instead of selecting the highest remaining merit holder Subaya Jan selected the lowest merit holder Suraya again in violation of rules.
When Subya filed petition to challenge the selection list, the official respondents file reply before the writ court saying Manazrakh has been divided into three wards hence Subaya could not be selected and writ petition was dismissed b the court.However, Subaya challenged the writ court judgment and when appeal cam eto be considered today the appellant counsel Bashir Ahmad Bashir argued that first of all any change made to the advertisement notice of any kind after its publication or after interview is not permissible under law hence the division of punch constituency of Manazrakh having been made after the advertisement notice being illegal same is not sustainable. The division bench after hearing the arguments made by Bashir, issued the notice and in the mean time directed the selection of Suraya
No comments:
Post a Comment